Click this link to optimize Open Town Hall for screen readers Skip to Content
Open Town Hall
Opengov

Survey Two: Concept Alternatives

1119 registered responses


Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 1 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.

1. Large land area dedicated to sports and recreation
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 41.3% 440
Neutral 35.6% 380
Bad Idea 21.3% 227
2. Consolidation of ramadas into spines found along pathways and near play features
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 53.8% 573
Neutral 31.8% 339
Bad Idea 10.9% 116
3. Replacement of two baseball fields with multi-purpose fields
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 58.9% 628
Neutral 25.3% 270
Bad Idea 15.0% 160
4. The creation of a desert-inspired garden to complement the rose garden
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 62.2% 663
Neutral 21.4% 228
Bad Idea 14.6% 156
5. Small community gardening areas located throughout the park
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 48.3% 515
Neutral 27.5% 293
Bad Idea 22.3% 238
6. An enlarged dog park accessible to two parking areas
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 38.8% 414
Neutral 39.2% 418
Bad Idea 19.8% 211
7. An overlook hovering over the north pond
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 52.1% 555
Neutral 32.3% 344
Bad Idea 12.9% 137
8. An additional outdoor performance venue and events lawn next to the north pond
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 40.0% 426
Neutral 34.4% 367
Bad Idea 23.5% 250
9. Placement of a large multi-generational play area with direct line of sight to ramadas
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 63.3% 675
Neutral 25.8% 275
Bad Idea 8.2% 87
10. The placement of a splash pad area alongside other play features
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 60.3% 643
Neutral 20.3% 216
Bad Idea 17.2% 183

What is your overall rating of Concept 1?

Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating)
Response Percent Response Count
1 10.4% 110
2 13.0% 138
3 34.0% 360
4 30.1% 319
5 12.5% 132

Tell us why you gave Concept 1 this rating

Answered
750
Skipped
369

Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 2 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.

1. Large land area dedicated to native plantings representative of diverse Sonoran habitats
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 56.6% 619
Neutral 23.0% 251
Bad Idea 18.6% 203
2. Removal of all but one baseball field to create a natural landscape the aids in flood control
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 60.3% 659
Neutral 16.2% 177
Bad Idea 23.0% 251
3. The realignment of Citation Wash to create floodable landscapes that improve water quality
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 71.2% 778
Neutral 18.3% 200
Bad Idea 8.3% 91
4. Observation structures and bird blinds to enjoy scenic views and wildlife watching throughout the park
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 56.4% 616
Neutral 26.3% 287
Bad Idea 14.9% 163
5. Reduced quantity of turf in favor of native desert landscaping practices
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 48.6% 531
Neutral 23.1% 252
Bad Idea 26.5% 290
6. Reduction in land area dedicated to the dog park
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 22.6% 247
Neutral 36.0% 394
Bad Idea 39.2% 428
7. Removal of parking from the south side of the park along 22nd Street
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 23.3% 255
Neutral 32.1% 351
Bad Idea 42.5% 464
8. Centralized approach to parking that places most spaces at the northeast side of the park.
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 24.6% 269
Neutral 35.6% 389
Bad Idea 37.3% 408
9. A large centralized playground rather than multiple smaller playgrounds
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 26.4% 289
Neutral 34.0% 372
Bad Idea 37.1% 406
10. Integration of a water play areas into the playground as an educational "creek" demonstrating Sonoran riparian wildlife
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 63.5% 694
Neutral 21.0% 230
Bad Idea 12.8% 140

What is your overall rating of Concept 2?

Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating)
Response Percent Response Count
1 15.6% 168
2 15.0% 162
3 18.6% 201
4 22.7% 245
5 28.0% 302

Tell us why you gave Concept 2 this rating

Answered
797
Skipped
322

Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 3 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.

1. Large area dedicated to cultural events, performances and festivals
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 43.5% 479
Neutral 32.7% 360
Bad Idea 21.6% 238
2. Creation of a vehicular loop with parking areas that allows easy access to ramadas and event venues
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 37.1% 408
Neutral 19.8% 218
Bad Idea 41.4% 455
3. Removal of all but one baseball field to create multi-purpose fields and event spaces
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 56.3% 619
Neutral 22.7% 250
Bad Idea 20.5% 226
4. The creation of an oxbow in the Citation Wash that divides the main event venues from the other areas of the park
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 24.8% 273
Neutral 52.5% 578
Bad Idea 19.3% 212
5. An enlarged dog park connected to walking trails
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 32.9% 362
Neutral 34.2% 376
Bad Idea 30.5% 335
6. Reduction in total land area dedicated to parking through the construction of a parking garage in order to create more green space
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 54.3% 597
Neutral 19.6% 216
Bad Idea 23.7% 261
7. Creation of a planted buffer between the Hi-Corbett Parking Lots and Randolph Way.
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 44.2% 486
Neutral 42.3% 465
Bad Idea 11.0% 121
8. A large centralized playground near the ARC rather than multiple smaller playgrounds
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 25.8% 284
Neutral 35.5% 390
Bad Idea 36.3% 399
9. Integration of an interactive water feature in the plaza at the outdoor performance center
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 44.7% 492
Neutral 28.7% 316
Bad Idea 23.3% 256
10. Multiple multi-purpose lawns for smaller social events or informal sports
Response Percent Response Count
Good Idea 50.5% 556
Neutral 30.9% 340
Bad Idea 14.8% 163

What is your overall rating of Concept 3?

Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating)
Response Percent Response Count
1 19.6% 211
2 16.7% 179
3 28.0% 301
4 23.1% 248
5 12.7% 136

Tell us why you gave Concept 3 this rating

Answered
773
Skipped
346

Based on the three concepts which do you believe…

1. Is the best place to go for a relaxing walk.
Response Percent Response Count
Concept 1 23.7% 248
Concept 2 59.5% 622
Concept 3 15.2% 159
2. Is the best place to bring children to play and learn.
Response Percent Response Count
Concept 1 35.1% 367
Concept 2 46.3% 484
Concept 3 16.7% 175
3. Is an inspiring place for large community events and performances.
Response Percent Response Count
Concept 1 17.8% 186
Concept 2 17.8% 186
Concept 3 61.7% 645
4. Is the type of park I'd use on a daily basis.
Response Percent Response Count
Concept 1 32.3% 338
Concept 2 48.0% 502
Concept 3 18.0% 188
5. Best matches the spirit and character of Tucson.
Response Percent Response Count
Concept 1 28.1% 294
Concept 2 48.7% 509
Concept 3 21.1% 220

Citation Wash: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using

Response Percent Response Count
1 32.9% 348
2 25.5% 270
3 23.5% 249
4 18.1% 192

Why? (Optional)

Answered
608
Skipped
511

Cooling Features: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using

Response Percent Response Count
1 4.5% 48
2 15.6% 166
3 19.3% 205
4 60.5% 642

Why? (optional)

Answered
603
Skipped
516

Cultural Venues: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using

Response Percent Response Count
1 18.2% 190
2 39.5% 412
3 16.2% 169
4 26.1% 273

Why? (Optional)

Answered
530
Skipped
589

Desert Landscape: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using

Response Percent Response Count
1 2.6% 27
2 14.3% 150
3 27.2% 286
4 55.9% 588

Why? (Optional)

Answered
576
Skipped
543

Dog Parks: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using

Response Percent Response Count
1 48.4% 493
2 19.9% 203
3 19.6% 200
4 12.0% 122

Why? (Optional)

Answered
528
Skipped
591
Name not available inside Ward 6
September 30, 2022, 11:35 PM
  • Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 1 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.
    • 1. Large land area dedicated to sports and recreation - Bad Idea
    • 2. Consolidation of ramadas into spines found along pathways and near play features - Neutral
    • 3. Replacement of two baseball fields with multi-purpose fields - Good Idea
    • 4. The creation of a desert-inspired garden to complement the rose garden - Bad Idea
    • 5. Small community gardening areas located throughout the park - Neutral
    • 6. An enlarged dog park accessible to two parking areas - Neutral
    • 7. An overlook hovering over the north pond - Neutral
    • 8. An additional outdoor performance venue and events lawn next to the north pond - Bad Idea
    • 9. Placement of a large multi-generational play area with direct line of sight to ramadas - Good Idea
    • 10. The placement of a splash pad area alongside other play features - Good Idea
  • What is your overall rating of Concept 1?
    • Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating) - 3
  • Tell us why you gave Concept 1 this rating

    I went to Reid Park this week to see what was working, what wasn't, and what people were doing. Here's what I saw: A lot of families spending time together. People kicking soccer balls or using open space for informal sports. Literally no one on the baseball fields.

    This plan has too much parking — especially the 30-space lot right in the middle of primo green space. Too many baseball fields remain. In general, the concept art on signs looks like a boring office park in Scottsdale, so I'm not super stoked about the new facilities. The renderings appear to have been done by someone who has never been responsible for childcare, never stood in the sun on a hot day, and definitely never done both at once.

    I like that there are playground spaces near both the north and south ends of the park. I don't think desert botanical gardens are not the best use of Reid Park. If the goal is ecological restoration, distributed plantings of mesquite, palo verde, and other locally appropriate trees will better fulfill that goal than an isolated simulation of a Sonoran ecosystem ... and they also provide shade. People love shade trees! It's what we sit under when the sun is out.

    I can't stress this enough. Plant trees that will provide shade. (And please don't cut down any mature trees! Even palm trees provide habitat. I saw an owl chilling out in a palm tree when I visited. He seemed to spend a lot of time there; there was a desiccated owl pellet on the ground below. It's appropriate to replace palms over time as they die off, but this city needs literally any trees so badly.)

    And for the love of god, landscape architects: Please knock it off with these silly loopy paths. People want to get from point A to point B as they walk across the park. The weird kidney-shaped paths that look extra-fancy in a birdseye rendering are so frustrating when a person wants to walk from (e.g.) the rose garden to the playground at the northwest corner. Imagine doing this while caring for a grandchild. No one in is like, "wow, this unnecessarily long path is so whimsical."

    If the golf course absolutely needs to continue existing, it should not continue to block bike and pedestrian access to the park from the east. The only way to the park is via 22nd, Broadway, or 5th — take your pick of four, five, or six-lane roads. The golf course has like four times the green space of Reid Park. It's big, exclusionary, and hostile to pedestrians. The number of features crammed into all these Reid Park redesigns are a reflection of how much public space we've sacrificed to a closed-off golf course.

  • Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 2 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.
    • 1. Large land area dedicated to native plantings representative of diverse Sonoran habitats - Bad Idea
    • 2. Removal of all but one baseball field to create a natural landscape the aids in flood control - Good Idea
    • 3. The realignment of Citation Wash to create floodable landscapes that improve water quality - Good Idea
    • 4. Observation structures and bird blinds to enjoy scenic views and wildlife watching throughout the park - Neutral
    • 5. Reduced quantity of turf in favor of native desert landscaping practices - Bad Idea
    • 6. Reduction in land area dedicated to the dog park - Neutral
    • 7. Removal of parking from the south side of the park along 22nd Street - Good Idea
    • 8. Centralized approach to parking that places most spaces at the northeast side of the park. - Good Idea
    • 9. A large centralized playground rather than multiple smaller playgrounds - Bad Idea
  • What is your overall rating of Concept 2?
    • Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating) - 3
  • Tell us why you gave Concept 2 this rating

    I like that this removes some parking. A central playground is less important than access to play areas for parents. The idea of integrating an artificial water feature into Citation Wash is like ... dude, Citation Wash is straight-up super-gnarly stormwater when it flows. The soil does a great job of capturing heavy metals dumped into the environment by motor vehicles. "I want my kid to play in a bioremediation area" is not a top outcome for me. Tucson just wants nice outdoor places to chill. We want green spaces because none of us have lawns. There's xeriscaping all over Tucson. The city needs a great big green space to just chill out and hang. With lots of shade trees.

    I just want to mention again what an absolute waste of space the golf course is. There needs to be bike and pedestrian access across the golf course. No amount of "featurizing" Reid Park can make up for the fact that the city-owned golf-course blocks recreational access to the city-owned park.

  • Tell us whether you think these elements of Concept 3 are a good idea, neutral or bad idea.
    • 1. Large area dedicated to cultural events, performances and festivals - Bad Idea
    • 2. Creation of a vehicular loop with parking areas that allows easy access to ramadas and event venues - Bad Idea
    • 3. Removal of all but one baseball field to create multi-purpose fields and event spaces - Good Idea
    • 4. The creation of an oxbow in the Citation Wash that divides the main event venues from the other areas of the park - Bad Idea
    • 5. An enlarged dog park connected to walking trails - Neutral
    • 6. Reduction in total land area dedicated to parking through the construction of a parking garage in order to create more green space - Neutral
    • 7. Creation of a planted buffer between the Hi-Corbett Parking Lots and Randolph Way. - Neutral
    • 8. A large centralized playground near the ARC rather than multiple smaller playgrounds - Bad Idea
    • 9. Integration of an interactive water feature in the plaza at the outdoor performance center - Bad Idea
  • What is your overall rating of Concept 3?
    • Overall Rating (1= Lowest rating, 5= Highest rating) - 1
  • Tell us why you gave Concept 3 this rating

    This isn't a park plan, it's a road-and-zoo-parking plan. This is hot garbage of the worst kind. Tucson deserves an awesome space to chill out, where families and kids can run and play. But instead this plan puts a road through some of the best green space in Tucson in order to provide access to literally a thousand new parking spots for the zoo.

    Above-ground parking costs about $35k per spot. So is Tucson going to spend $35 to $63 million building zoo parking?

    What a colossal waste of money and open space. Please, please, please don't put a loop road through Reid Park.

  • Based on the three concepts which do you believe…
    • 1. Is the best place to go for a relaxing walk. - Concept 1
    • 2. Is the best place to bring children to play and learn. - Concept 1
    • 3. Is an inspiring place for large community events and performances. - Concept 1
    • 4. Is the type of park I'd use on a daily basis. - Concept 1
    • 5. Best matches the spirit and character of Tucson. - Concept 1
  • Citation Wash: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 2
  • Why? (Optional)
    Because it's a city park, the use case is chilling out.
  • Cooling Features: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 3
  • Why? (optional)
    Splash pad goal = kids run and scream until tired out. Also, trees. Please, high-friction surfaces.
  • Cultural Venues: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 4
  • Why? (Optional)
    Least amount of concrete / rock. I just want to chill in the dang park, man.
  • Desert Landscape: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 4
  • Why? (Optional)
    I just want to chill in the park under a tree.
  • Dog Parks: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 4
  • Why? (Optional)
    Grass, shade, no weird pointless hills with unnecessarily steep grades.
  • Multipurpose Rec: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    No response.
  • Why? (Optional)
    Why do you want to pave everything can you not tell from my comments how badly I need to touch grass
  • Observation Structures: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 4
  • Why? (Optional)
    This is the only option that doesn't look ridiculous
  • Parking Garage: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    No response.
  • Why? (Optional)
    Have you lost your mind literally no one enjoys visiting or using a parking garage
  • Pedestrian Infrastructure: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    • 1
  • Why? (Optional)
    I like bicycles
  • Playscapes: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    No response.
  • Why? (Optional)
    Who mocked up image number two and have they ever been responsible for a child
  • Plazas: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    No response.
  • Why? (Optional)
    THESE ARE SUMMERTIME HELLSCAPES UNSUITABLE FOR HUMAN USE
  • Shade: Select an image that looks most like a place you'd enjoy visiting and using
    No response.
  • Why? (Optional)
    It appears that we are planning for a future in which trees are no longer a viable form of shade
  • Did you, or will you, attend the Open House on September 10th at Reid Park OPC (5-7pm)?
    • No
  • I am...
    • a full-time resident of the Tucson metro area (more than 6 months a year)
  • How would you best identify yourself? (select all that apply)
    • Prefer not to say
  • What is your age?
    • 25-44
  • How do you describe your gender identity?
    • Other - autistic, need to touch grass
  • What is your household income?
    • Prefer not to say
  • What is your zip code?
    No response.
  • How far do you live from Reid Park?
    • More than 5 miles (8 km)
  • Is there anything else you'd like to tell us? (optional)

    Please don't put a loop road through Reid Park. There are so few quiet areas in this town where we can get away from cars. This makes me so sad.

    Also, please build a bike/ped path across the golf course; it's ridiculous that a city-owned property blocks so much access to a city-owned park. Any park plan that doesn't consider access is incomplete.

Open Town Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open Town Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Part 1 - Put on your designer hat! In this section, you will be shown three concept alternatives and asked to rate each on their performance in a variety of factors. We want to know aspects of the plan that resonate or do not resonate with you. Rather than picking a concept you like the most, think about the different elements of the concept alternatives that you want to see in the final master plan!

Each of the three concept alternatives envisions Reid Park's future with a distinct approach that prioritizes certain aspects of the park. Through these concept alternatives, trade-offs are illustrated between the recreational, cultural, and environmental goals of the park. Your evaluation of these different concepts will help us understand how best to balance these three needs.

Check out our guidelines for civility
Back to Intro  
  Page 1 of 7