Click this link to optimize Tempe Forum for screen readers Skip to Content
Tempe Forum
Opengov

Give your input on the draft Preserves Management Plan!

38 registered responses


Have you had an opportunity to review the draft plan?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 73.7% 28
No 2.6% 1
Some of it 23.7% 9

Do you currently visit the preserves? Select all that apply.

Response Percent Response Count
Yes, Hayden Butte Preserve 71.1% 27
Yes, Papago Preserve (includes Evelyn Hallman Park and Moeur Park) 78.9% 30
I don’t visit the preserves 2.6% 1

In your opinion, what three recommendations should the city prioritize first? Please list in order of importance with #1 being the most important.

Answered
32
Skipped
6

Please provide comments on the recommendations related to Hayden Butte Preserve.

Answered
25
Skipped
13

Please provide comments on the recommendations related to Papago Preserve.

Answered
28
Skipped
10

In your opinion, what three objectives should the city prioritize first? Please list in order of importance with #1 being the most important.

Answered
24
Skipped
14

Please provide comments on the draft Preserve Management Plan objectives.

Answered
17
Skipped
21

Additional comments on the overall draft Preserve Management Plan

Answered
21
Skipped
17
Name not shown inside Tempe
December 5, 2024, 6:48 PM
  • Have you had an opportunity to review the draft plan?
    • Yes
  • Do you currently visit the preserves? Select all that apply.
    • Yes, Hayden Butte Preserve
  • In your opinion, what three recommendations should the city prioritize first? Please list in order of importance with #1 being the most important.
    • 4.3.8 trail improvements. On making it safer-just don't turn it into all sidewalk and concrete stairs - keep it a 'trail in the preserve' not another long sidewalk
    • 4.1.5 the overall trail plan - closing social trails that have been cut in...and doing something to keep that from continuing to happen would be a highly visible improvement
    • 4.3.1 keep the holiday displays - if it was a ballot proposition it'd probably pass at a higher rate than any other issue or person on the ballot.
  • Please provide comments on the recommendations related to Hayden Butte Preserve.

    Pushing more people to use the butte will bring additional people that don't know, or choose not to follow, the rules needed to protect it. This happens each year with the 'hike the butte' promotion in the spring. The last two years during that promotion there hasn't been a single additional sign during the promotion encouraging responsible behavior. Something that brings that many new people to the butte, needs additional simple signs with basic expected behavior -the only people reading clear through the current large signs full of fine print are people that are probably following those common sense/respect the place type behaviors in the first place.

    4.3.2 'The A". Let's be realistic , the A's not going away - and people aren't going to call it Hayden Butte, even if it is. Don't waste the limited resources available for preserve improvement to go to battle with the massive fight that would come from trying to tear the A off A Mountain.

  • Please provide comments on the recommendations related to Papago Preserve.

    I've spent less than 5 hours in the Papago Preserve in the last ten years and don't believe my comments should carry any weight.

  • In your opinion, what three objectives should the city prioritize first? Please list in order of importance with #1 being the most important.
    No response.
  • Please provide comments on the draft Preserve Management Plan objectives.

    section 4 - (what's really going to happen, like removing the A or the holiday displays) - seems magnitudes of importance above section 5 ( 'reassess goals, objectives, decisions, activities and related policies so they can be adapted to the change in surrounding land use..continuously identify and reassess partnerships. that would align with the plan goal...)
    We need to get section 4 right - it's the part that affects people.

  • Additional comments on the overall draft Preserve Management Plan

    It's great the city had multiple forums to get input on all of this.
    I hope the actual decision makers are on the butte and in the preserve at a variety of times of day on a variety of days of the week over a variety of months before they make these decisions.

    Somewhere it's mentioned that volunteer groups could help the plan without costing the city - that's a great idea - the city users themselves and think of the potential numbers of people, hours, and enthusiasm that could come from ASU alone.

Tempe Forum is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Tempe Forum is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Tempe Forum has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Community Feedback will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Community Feedback will just share your response with Tempe staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Tempe Forum). Registration is free.

The City of Tempe has contracted with Community Feedback to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the City of Tempe restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Community Feedback enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Community Feedback uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the City of Tempe guidelines for civility, Community Feedback uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Community Feedback will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the City of Tempe to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Tempe Forum, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Community Feedback is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Community Feedback is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The City of Tempe offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The City of Tempe has contracted with OpenGov to administer Tempe Forum.

The draft Preserves Management Plan helps to design future cultural, educational and recreational opportunities at Tempe's desert park and preserve habitats.

The purpose of a Preserve, per ordinance, is to establish habitat for desert vegetation, wildlife and natural resources, and to protect archaeological, paleontological and historical resources while providing appropriate public access. The plan will help the City follow the ordinance and responsibly provide cultural, educational, and recreation opportunities designed to heighten appreciation and enjoyment of the natural desert environment.

The draft plan documents and evaluates existing conditions and develops recommendations for how to better think about, interact and ultimately care for and manage these special areas.


* required

Section 4 of the draft plan includes recommendations for the protection and restoration of the natural and cultural resources of Tempe’s preserves.


Section 5.2, table 4 of the draft plan includes the plan’s objectives and strategies to achieve them.


Check out our guidelines for civility

Fields marked with * are required

Back to Intro  
  Page 1 of 2