Click this link to optimize Tempe Forum for screen readers Skip to Content
Tempe Forum
Opengov

Provide feedback on a proposed ordinance that would establish a tobacco sales license, enact fees to ensure compliance, and raise the minimum age of tobacco purchase to 21 years old.

65 registered responses


Do you support establishing a tobacco sales license in the City of Tempe?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 75.4% 49
No 21.5% 14
Don't know 3.1% 2

Why or why not?

Answered
46
Skipped
19

If a tobacco sales license is established, do you support the proposed fees to ensure compliance?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 72.3% 47
No 23.1% 15
Don't know 4.6% 3

Why or why not?

Answered
35
Skipped
30

Do you support increasing the minimum age for purchase of tobacco products to age 21?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 75.4% 49
No 23.1% 15
Don't know 1.5% 1

Why or why not?

Answered
43
Skipped
22

Do you currently use tobacco products?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 27.7% 18
No 58.5% 38
I used to 13.8% 9

Do you currently own, manage or work at an establishment that sells tobacco products?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 26.6% 17
No 70.3% 45
Prefer not to answer 3.1% 2

Do you have any other comments?

Answered
33
Skipped
32
Name not shown inside Tempe
April 2, 2023, 12:34 PM
  • Do you support establishing a tobacco sales license in the City of Tempe?
    • Yes
  • Why or why not?

    Yes, however isn’t this more of a State legislation Licencing or laws for AZ. I honestly feel as a city, you’re being a little ambitious & overreaching your power from city dealing with State Legislators lawmaking decisions. You’re acting like influencers for the Stare. But raising the State legal age to 21 takes the State Legislation. In my opinion, you’re voting on items in the wrong forum and from the improper elected offices, this is a Stare decision. Not one for the City Of Tempe.

  • If a tobacco sales license is established, do you support the proposed fees to ensure compliance?
    • Yes
  • Why or why not?

    Yes I support the fees. I ask though, Do you support holding the minors who smoke under the age of 21 accountable with tickets & fines? The minor who is in possession of tobacco is breaking the law, but you have absolutely NO consequences for these teens and young adults. Why? You expect adults to act within the law, but as adults we have consequences for breaking laws, so why then do you let minors run the streets of Tempe with tobacco products and no punishments for the youths. In their schools, where is the fines and punishment. When you start holding everyone accountable for proper use, and tobacco sales. Then will this be a just and fair law or ordinance. If any of you are parents, if you don’t have consequences for your child and you ask them to stop…will they…we all know the answer is NO, not without sufficient punishment for the minor. And that minor is truly breaking the law when it comes to tobacco! So punish the right people, hold the stores to our professionalism. And hold the minors to obeying the laws!! Instead of continuing to give them a free pass. Make under age tobacco consumption laws equal to alcohol underaged consumption laws, with equal punishment!! If you start there, you’ll get further to helping out the community to the fullest. Protecting business integrity with tobacco licensing, while saving our youth with new underage tobacco consumption laws! It’s a real win for the community. You don’t have to do a flavor ban when you hold the teens breaking the laws accountable! It’s that simple.

  • Do you support increasing the minimum age for purchase of tobacco products to age 21?
    • Yes
  • Why or why not?

    It’s a Federal Law, and once again this is a question and a vote for our State Legislators. As City Council members your taking on State laws as a city. But, here again, the Federal Government has already raised the age over a year or two ago. Our state is late to the party… but every retailer is only selling to 21 and up. So, maybe you should push this on up to the Capital building for the correct people to make it a state law.

  • Do you currently use tobacco products?
    • No
  • Do you currently own, manage or work at an establishment that sells tobacco products?
    • Yes
  • Do you have any other comments?

    Thank you for allowing me to respond. I think it is nice to have a lot of students write essays on the dangers of smoking. Essays are easy to get out of a classroom from almost every teacher if they ask their students. And that extra credit point only goes so far.
    Because without underage tobacco consumption laws kids will continue to be kids! We need laws holding all underage tobacco use punishable by fines, and holding the youths who are breaking the laws accountable. This will drastically drop your underage smoking. You give the minors free rein over smoking and vaping, and stand with the minor pointing the fingers at retailers. Well, the problem is the minor who is smoking and making the decision to smoke! Hold them accountable, give them a ticket for breaking the laws. Stop letting the real tobacco criminals go free with out any punishment, the minors who continually break the laws and smoke. They need to be held accountable and stopped, before they turn the bad decision into a bad habit that they can’t easily break. If you really want to help the youth of the community then put in fully comprehensive laws for underage tobacco consumption as well as the tobacco Licencing. Make the entire community safe that way. If you do a vape ban you will be crossing into the mmj industry, and a lot of mmj patients Vape their meds! A flavor ban would simply be telling adults they have no freedoms of choice. Because you couldn’t control the youth in our community, by having underage tobacco consumption laws.
    It has at that point nothing to do with flavors.. more of controlling tobacco…from retail and from minors who break the laws. It really can be that simple. Not a political standing point!

Tempe Forum is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Tempe Forum is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Tempe Forum has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Community Feedback will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Community Feedback will just share your response with Tempe staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Tempe Forum). Registration is free.

The City of Tempe has contracted with Community Feedback to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the City of Tempe restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Community Feedback enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Community Feedback uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the City of Tempe guidelines for civility, Community Feedback uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Community Feedback will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the City of Tempe to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Tempe Forum, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Community Feedback is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Community Feedback is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The City of Tempe offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The City of Tempe has contracted with OpenGov to administer Tempe Forum.

Please review the proposed ordinance and fees.

Proposed ordinance 

Proposed ordinance with redlines


Check out our guidelines for civility
Back to Intro