It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
OF the options for D2 moving into D4, this one makes sense based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Which maps could you support?
Map 101 V2 - Could Support
Map 102 V2 - Could Support
Map 102 V3 - Could Support
Map 104 V2 - Could Support
Which map is your top choice?
Map 102 V2
Comment:
I'd prefer an option that included the mobile homes south of 101 east of Fair Oaks in District 5.
Which "Fair Oaks notch" option do you prefer?
(A) No notch
What is your age category?
30 to 49 years old
What is your family or household annual income?
More than $200,000
What is your race/ethnicity?
Non-Hispanic White
What is your housing tenure?
Owner
Comments:
I am not certain if I prefer the no-notch or notch option for District 5 and District 6. I understand from this survey that both neighborhood associations (mobile home units & SNAIL) prefer keeping the notch. This makes sense if you want to have someone who strongly represents housing interests (mobile home & single family/condo interests) However, if you want to have councilmember accountable to traffic and physical neighborhood concerns, I would eliminate the notch and put Fair Oaks mobile homes into District 5. I voted for no notch. Ultimately, I would like to hear from the residents of the Fair Oaks mobile homes and nearby condos what they would prefer...not just from the neighborhood associations.
Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
OF the options for D2 moving into D4, this one makes sense based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Like:
It makes sense for Las Palmas & Cherry Orchard to move into D1 based on major road boundaries.
Dislike:
The weird notch in District 5 south of 101 and west of Fair Oaks- the mobile homes here have more in common with district 5 than district 6 because they are south of 101.
Which maps could you support?
Which map is your top choice?
Comment:
I'd prefer an option that included the mobile homes south of 101 east of Fair Oaks in District 5.Which "Fair Oaks notch" option do you prefer?
What is your age category?
What is your family or household annual income?
What is your race/ethnicity?
What is your housing tenure?
Comments:
I am not certain if I prefer the no-notch or notch option for District 5 and District 6. I understand from this survey that both neighborhood associations (mobile home units & SNAIL) prefer keeping the notch. This makes sense if you want to have someone who strongly represents housing interests (mobile home & single family/condo interests) However, if you want to have councilmember accountable to traffic and physical neighborhood concerns, I would eliminate the notch and put Fair Oaks mobile homes into District 5. I voted for no notch. Ultimately, I would like to hear from the residents of the Fair Oaks mobile homes and nearby condos what they would prefer...not just from the neighborhood associations.