This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
Dislike:
The population spread is high, at 7.7%. Enlarging D2 slightly would help with this.
Like:
This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
Dislike:
Again, population deviation is high, at 7.5%. Enlarging D2 by bringing in the Cherry Orchard apartments would help.
Like:
This map avoids voter deferrals and has the tightest population balance of any of the four finalists, at 6.02%. It *generally* maintains communities of interest and follows reasonable geographic boundaries, with one notable exception.
Dislike:
The "boot" cutting from D2 into D4 is... difficult to accept in my opinion, because of the way that it leaves a sliver of D4 north of it. I believe that this could be confusing to residents northeast of Old SF and Wolfe.
Like:
Full disclosure, I drew this map. This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
* has the second-best population balance (6.26%)
Note that the small bite I had D2 take out of D4 is a townhouse complex, so this is a somewhat self-contained community of interest. It is separated from the rest of D4 by Evelyn Ave. to the South and Pine Cone Lumber to the East, so this does not split up neighborhoods.
Dislike:
I wish that I could have gotten the population deviation lower, but doing so would have required either voter deferrals or having additional boundaries (other than the Fair Oaks notch) break from Census block lines. However, 6.26% is the second best, with Map 102V3 beating it by less than 0.25%.
Note: It appears that an incorrect data sheet has been attached to this item, since it appears to have identical data to map 102V2B.
Which maps could you support?
Map 101 V2 - Would Not Support
Map 102 V2 - Could Support
Map 102 V3 - Would Not Support
Map 104 V2 - Could Support
Which map is your top choice?
Map 104 V2
Comment:
No response.
Which "Fair Oaks notch" option do you prefer?
(C) Surgical notch (encompassing only Fair Oaks Mobile Home Park)
What is your age category?
30 to 49 years old
What is your family or household annual income?
More than $200,000
What is your race/ethnicity?
Non-Hispanic White
What is your housing tenure?
Renter
Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
Like:
This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
Dislike:
The population spread is high, at 7.7%. Enlarging D2 slightly would help with this.
Like:
This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
Dislike:
Again, population deviation is high, at 7.5%. Enlarging D2 by bringing in the Cherry Orchard apartments would help.
Like:
This map avoids voter deferrals and has the tightest population balance of any of the four finalists, at 6.02%. It *generally* maintains communities of interest and follows reasonable geographic boundaries, with one notable exception.
Dislike:
The "boot" cutting from D2 into D4 is... difficult to accept in my opinion, because of the way that it leaves a sliver of D4 north of it. I believe that this could be confusing to residents northeast of Old SF and Wolfe.
Like:
Full disclosure, I drew this map. This map:
* maintains communities of interest
* avoids voter deferrals
* follows logical geographic boundaries
* has the second-best population balance (6.26%)
Note that the small bite I had D2 take out of D4 is a townhouse complex, so this is a somewhat self-contained community of interest. It is separated from the rest of D4 by Evelyn Ave. to the South and Pine Cone Lumber to the East, so this does not split up neighborhoods.
Dislike:
I wish that I could have gotten the population deviation lower, but doing so would have required either voter deferrals or having additional boundaries (other than the Fair Oaks notch) break from Census block lines. However, 6.26% is the second best, with Map 102V3 beating it by less than 0.25%.
Note: It appears that an incorrect data sheet has been attached to this item, since it appears to have identical data to map 102V2B.
Which maps could you support?
Which map is your top choice?
Comment:
No response.Which "Fair Oaks notch" option do you prefer?
What is your age category?
What is your family or household annual income?
What is your race/ethnicity?
What is your housing tenure?