Review of Current Ethics Code for Elected and Appointed Officials

What are your thoughts on the current ethics code for elected and appointed officials?

This topic is closed

7 registered responses

June 15, 2016, 8:05 AM

Are there areas of concern you have with the current Ethics Code?

Yes..... Sugar Land City Council members also sitting on the Development Corporation creates the opportunity for significant conflict of interest. How can City Council members take election contributions from Developers who they then negotiate with as members of the Development Corporation?
Are there issues you believe are missing from the current Ethics Code that need to be addressed?

Conflict of interest needs to be much more clearly defined, and circumstances where City Council members and development Corp members MUST recuse themselves from decisions MUST be detailed
Any other additional information you would like the Citizens Ethics Task Force to consider?

The importance of clarifying conflicts of interest and when elected officials MUST recuse themselves from decisions

Online Town Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Online Town Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Are there areas of concern you have with the current Ethics Code?

Are there issues you believe are missing from the current Ethics Code that need to be addressed?

Any other additional information you would like the Citizens Ethics Task Force to consider?

What is a disruptive statement?

A statement

containing personal attacks, profanity, commercial advertising or content which is entirely off-topic, and/or
from a user who has falsified their registration information with the intent to post multiple statements in one topic or to misrepresent their city of residence.

Why does Open Town Hall monitor for disruptive statements?

OpenGov is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate if the forum has disruptive statements.

Does Open Town Hall find many disruptive statements?

No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements are disruptive.

What does Open Town Hall do if they find a disruptive statement?

Open Town Hall

moves the statement to a different web page,
describes the problem in an email to the author, and
invites the author to change the statement.

Does Open Town Hall ever edit or delete statements?

Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement.

If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?

Yes. Open Town Hall encourages open dialog which, by necessity, includes disagreements.

How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?

Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.
Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.

Personal Attack	Not A Personal Attack
He lied.	He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.
She misrepresented the truth.	I don't trust her.
He is greedy.	He is making plenty of money.
It is merely a power play on her part.	She will announce her candidacy soon.