Please see the City's Social Media Policy
for more on statement standards. The section on content standards are below:
Any City social media site that elicits or allows comments from the public shall be designated as a limited public forum for First Amendment purposes. As such, and in order to promote the City's goals articulated above and remain in compliance with other laws, City social media site content shall not contain any of the following.
1. Profane language or content;
2. Sexual content or links to sexual content;
3. Content that promotes, fosters, or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, age, religion, gender, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, national origin, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation; or other protected characteristic
4. Solicitations or commerce;
5. Conduct or encouragement of illegal activity;
6. Information that may compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems
7. Libelous or defamatory comments;
a. Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes a person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure a person in his or her occupation.
8. Content that violates a legal ownership interest of any other party;
9. Private or personal information published without consent
10. Comments not topically related to the particular social medium article being commented upon
These guidelines shall be displayed to users or made available by hyperlink on all City social media sites. Any content removed based on these guidelines must be retained, including the time, date and identity of poster, when available. If the comment cannot be removed due to the social media platform where the post originated, the department may choose to address the post by monitoring the activity of the commenter, sending a direct message, muting, blocking, or reporting negative activity to the social media platform where it originated. Users posting to the City's social media sites shall be informed that the City disclaims any and all responsibility and liability for any materials that the City deems inappropriate for posting. Daily maintenance and monitoring of these social media sites is the responsibility of the applicable City Department.
Please select the first community center you would like to provide feedback for. You will have the opportunity to comment on all community centers or you can skip to the ones you want to comment on. Please select the next community center you would like to provide feedback for in sequential order.
What are your priorities for the Beresford Center? Please allocate the dots to your top priorities.
Please discuss your perspectives.
Yes, expand the Recreation facility, and offer more QUALITY teachers. The current teacher for the 50 and Better aerobics/ dance class seems to have very little training for this specific age group. Some movements she directs are actually harmful. She is not responsive to people continuing in the class - and people continue because it is the ideal time slot, not because of the teacher. She is in sharp contrast to Jill Daly (previous teacher) who is an excellent teacher - like having a PHd level teacher. Zumba Gold is great but needs to be at another time, 6-7 is awful. Need to be daytime class. Some borderline seniors do not want to embrace the Senior Center quite yet, so it's nice to have bridging classes at Beresford.
What is your vision for the Beresford Center?
An easy to walk to hub of activity for the neighborhood. Continuing variety of activities for kids especially.
Please select the next community center you are interested in providing feedback for: