Click this link to optimize Speak Up San Mateo! for screen readers Skip to Content
Speak Up San Mateo!
Opengov

What types of intersection improvements do you desire for the Hillsdale Blvd & Alameda de las Pulgas Traffic Signal project?

22 registered responses


What neighborhood do you live in?

Response Percent Response Count
Hillsdale/Beresford 72.7% 16
San Mateo/Glendale Village 9.1% 2
Other 18.2% 4

What is your age?

Response Percent Response Count
35-44 31.8% 7
45-54 27.3% 6
55+ 40.9% 9

What modes of transportation do you currently use when travelling through the intersection? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Driving 81.8% 18
Walking 63.6% 14
Biking or Rolling (skateboard, kick scooter, etc.) 36.4% 8
Transit (e.g. bus) 4.5% 1

What are the priorities that you wish to be addressed by the project at the intersection? (Please pick up to 3)

Response Percent Response Count
Congestion 59.1% 13
Pedestrian Safety 90.9% 20
Bicycle Safety 45.5% 10
Vehicle Speeding / Reckless Driving 45.5% 10
Maintaining Existing Aesthetics 13.6% 3
Other 4.5% 1

What is your general feeling of safety for each mode of transportation (walking, biking or rolling, driving, transit) at the intersection? (with 1=feeling not at all safe and 5=feeling completely safe)

Driving
Response Percent Response Count
N/A 4.5% 1
1 4.5% 1
2 13.6% 3
3 31.8% 7
4 27.3% 6
5 18.2% 4
Walking
Response Percent Response Count
1 18.2% 4
2 36.4% 8
3 31.8% 7
4 4.5% 1
5 9.1% 2
Biking / Rolling
Response Percent Response Count
N/A 27.3% 6
1 18.2% 4
2 31.8% 7
3 4.5% 1
4 4.5% 1
5 13.6% 3
Transit
Response Percent Response Count
N/A 40.9% 9
2 9.1% 2
3 9.1% 2
4 9.1% 2
5 31.8% 7

What safety concerns do you have regarding pedestrians at the intersection? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Poor pedestrian visibility 36.4% 8
Right turning vehicles conflicting with pedestrians 54.5% 12
Left turning vehicles conflicting with pedestrians 63.6% 14
Bicyclists conflicting with pedestrians 9.1% 2
I have no concerns regarding pedestrians at this intersection 18.2% 4
Other 18.2% 4

What safety concerns do you have regarding bicycles at the intersection? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Connectivity to other bicycle lanes or routes through the intersection 40.9% 9
Poor bicyclist visibility 31.8% 7
Crossing between vehicles and bicyclists 50.0% 11
I have no concerns regarding bicycles at this intersection 22.7% 5
Other 22.7% 5

What concerns do you have regarding motor vehicles at the intersection? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Travel time / congestion 50.0% 11
Visibility of other motorists or other roadway users 9.1% 2
Conflicts with bicyclists / pedestrians 40.9% 9
I have no concerns regarding vehicles at this intersection 18.2% 4
Other 40.9% 9

Is this an improvement you would like to see at the intersection?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 40.9% 9
No 59.1% 13

What are your concerns about the potential trade-offs? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Ability to implement a left-turn lane 36.4% 8
No concerns about these trade-offs 45.5% 10
Other 18.2% 4

Is this an improvement you would like to see at the intersection?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 36.4% 8
No 63.6% 14

What are your concerns about the potential trade-offs? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Restricts right turns while the signal is red 27.3% 6
No concerns about these trade-offs 59.1% 13
Other 22.7% 5

Is this an improvement you would like to see at the intersection?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 63.6% 14
No 36.4% 8

What are your concerns about the potential trade-offs? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Reduced opportunity for median refuge islands 18.2% 4
Reduced parking near the intersection 9.1% 2
Reduced opportunity for left-turn lanes 27.3% 6
No concerns about these trade-offs 59.1% 13
Other 4.5% 1

Is this an improvement you would like to see at the intersection?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 45.5% 10
No 54.5% 12

What are your concerns about the potential trade-offs? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Reduced opportunity for bike lanes 40.9% 9
Reduced parking near the intersection 13.6% 3
Turning conflicts 36.4% 8
No concerns about these trade-offs 31.8% 7
Other 18.2% 4

Is this an improvement you would like to see at the intersection?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 59.1% 13
No 40.9% 9

What are your concerns about the potential trade-offs? (select all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Curb extension width reduction if installed together 18.2% 4
Landscaped median / tree removal 18.2% 4
Parking near the intersection 4.5% 1
No concerns about these trade-offs 50.0% 11
Other 27.3% 6

Do you have any additional comments or concerns?

Answered
13
Skipped
9

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Speak Up San Mateo! has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Community Feedback will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Community Feedback will just share your response with San Mateo staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Speak Up San Mateo!). Registration is free.

The City of San Mateo has contracted with Community Feedback to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the City of San Mateo restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Community Feedback enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Community Feedback uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the City of San Mateo guidelines for civility, Community Feedback uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Community Feedback will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the City of San Mateo to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Speak Up San Mateo!, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Community Feedback is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Community Feedback is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The City of San Mateo offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The City of San Mateo has contracted with OpenGov to administer Speak Up San Mateo!.

* required
* required
* required
Choose at most 3 options
* required
N/A
1
2
3
4
5
Driving
Walking
Biking / Rolling
Transit
* required
* required
* required
* required

Press NEXT below to proceed to the last page of the survey where you'll be asked questions about specific improvements you'd like to see incorporated at the intersection. 

Check out our guidelines for civility

Fields marked with * are required

Back to Intro  
  Page 1 of 2