Click this link to optimize Open City Hall for screen readers Skip to Content
Open City Hall
Opengov

What do you think of a proposed plan to manage on-street parking in higher demand areas?

699 registered responses


Do you live in Provo?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 94.4% 660
No 5.6% 39

If you don’t live in Provo, what activities bring you to Provo? (check all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Work/business 48.0% 73
School 84.9% 129
Shopping/dining/events 37.5% 57
Other 12.5% 19

In your experience, are there issues with crowded parking in Provo?

Crowded parking
Response Percent Response Count
no problem 3.1% 22
in a few areas 34.6% 242
in many areas 41.3% 289
everywhere 20.9% 146

How much should cost recovery or subsidization be part of more parking enforcement?

Cost of parking enforcement
Response Percent Response Count
0% subsidized, 100% cost recovery 11.9% 83
25% subsidized, 75% cost recovery 8.7% 61
50% subsidized, 50% cost recovery 14.6% 102
75% subsidized, 25% cost recovery 13.3% 93
100% subsidized, 0% cost recovery 51.5% 360

Rate your support of the concept of paid parking as a mitigation tool against crowded on-street parking?

Support
Response Percent Response Count
Don't support at all 80.1% 560
- 7.9% 55
Might support 6.0% 42
+ 3.0% 21
Really support 3.0% 21

How important are these factors in a parking management program?

More enforcement
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 51.4% 359
Somewhat important 25.9% 181
Important 14.2% 99
Very important 5.7% 40
Not sure 2.9% 20
Clear signage
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 4.1% 29
Somewhat important 4.7% 33
Important 21.9% 153
Very important 68.5% 479
Not sure 0.7% 5
Ease of payment for parking
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 21.9% 153
Somewhat important 12.0% 84
Important 21.7% 152
Very important 38.2% 267
Not sure 6.2% 43
Permits for property owners
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 17.9% 125
Somewhat important 14.3% 100
Important 23.7% 166
Very important 37.5% 262
Not sure 6.6% 46
Time limits
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 50.4% 352
Somewhat important 27.0% 189
Important 13.6% 95
Very important 6.7% 47
Not sure 2.3% 16
Cost recovery
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 51.4% 359
Somewhat important 20.2% 141
Important 11.2% 78
Very important 7.4% 52
Not sure 9.9% 69
Parking fees
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 62.7% 438
Somewhat important 16.7% 117
Important 10.9% 76
Very important 6.7% 47
Not sure 3.0% 21
Resident input
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 4.7% 33
Somewhat important 5.3% 37
Important 11.3% 79
Very important 75.3% 526
Not sure 3.4% 24

Do you have any other comments about this proposal?

Answered
575
Skipped
124
Name not shown inside Joaquin
October 14, 2021, 7:00 PM
  • Do you live in Provo?
    • Yes
  • If you don’t live in Provo, what activities bring you to Provo? (check all that apply)
    No response.
  • In your experience, are there issues with crowded parking in Provo?
    • Crowded parking - everywhere
  • How much should cost recovery or subsidization be part of more parking enforcement?
    • Cost of parking enforcement - 100% subsidized, 0% cost recovery
  • Rate your support of the concept of paid parking as a mitigation tool against crowded on-street parking?
    • Support - Don't support at all
  • How important are these factors in a parking management program?
    • More enforcement - Important
    • Clear signage - Very important
    • Ease of payment for parking - Not important
    • Permits for property owners - Very important
    • Time limits - Not important
    • Cost recovery - Not important
    • Parking fees - Not important
    • Resident input - Very important
  • Do you have any other comments about this proposal?

    The parking problem in Provo will never go away because the Provo City Government for years has allowed large complexes to be built without requiring a parking spot for each tenant (don't believe me, one of the most recent large complexes was "The Village" and the city did not require a parking spot for each tenant). You can't change that now but only going forward. The economic life blood of Provo City has always been the University and it's students and now all's you want to do is tax the students for parking on the streets. It's ridiculous (I am not a college student but a home owner). Every college town in the US has parking issues. You are trying to solve a problem by making people "think" that paying for parking will help and it will do nothing but upset the students and drive them away. This does not solve any problem but is just another way for Provo City to raise more money for the city government. It's just a tax and a psychological game you play so that some residents will think it will help. Where will the students park? Do you want a lot of BYU and UVU students to leave and go to school somewhere else because they don't want to pay to park on the streets?. You already charge millions and millions of extra dollars each year by secretly over-charging the Provo residents in their utility bills for Water, Sewer, Electricity and Garbage and those over-charged millions have nothing to do with utilities but go to the general coffers of the city government and now you just want to add another tax "Paid Parking". I'm embarrassed by my elected leaders, seriously, tell me how on earth "Paid Parking" is going to solve any parking issues in Provo around a University??? You need to look at the economic consequences of driving the students away. NOTHING on this survey addresses the consequences of "Paid Parking", that tells me the government leaders wanting to do this don't have a clue what they are doing. Whenever you make a major change, there are always consequences and you are not addressing any of those potential consequences. Provo is a university town and it always has been. Yes there are many wonderful home owners (I am one of them) but taxing the students to park on the streets (yes that's all it is is a tax) is not going to solve any parking problem but it's going to cause larger problems when students start leaving this city. Common sense says if you want plenty of on street parking where you live, don't move to a college town, if you don't like the wind, don't move to the coast, if you don't like rain, don't move to the state of Washington, if you don't like heat, don't move to Arizona. I love our college students, yes our streets are crowded and even I get frustrated at times but I have chosen to live near a university so my streets will be full of student cars and that's a consequence of my choosing to live here. Do NOT punish the students by taxing them (I have no college students). I love living here, STOP the taxes and fees. I am so looking forward to ANY politician that can solve a problem without raising taxes and fees, I'm waiting. PLEASE address the consequences of paid parking before you do some psychological paid parking tax.

Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Open City Hall has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Community Feedback will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Community Feedback will just share your response with Provo City Council staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Open City Hall). Registration is free.

The Provo City Council has contracted with Community Feedback to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the Provo City Council restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Community Feedback enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Community Feedback uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the Provo City Council guidelines for civility, Community Feedback uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Community Feedback will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the Provo City Council to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Open City Hall, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Community Feedback is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Community Feedback is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The Provo City Council offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The Provo City Council has contracted with OpenGov to administer Open City Hall.

* required
no problem
in a few areas
in many areas
everywhere
Crowded parking
* required

For the next question, it is helpful to understand some of the terms we are using.

  • Cost recovery refers to recovering the costs of the expense of additional enforcement by charging a fee to those who use the parking in the OSPM area.
  • Subsidization refers to having covering some of the expense from other revenue sources collected by the City (which has an impact on other services provided by the city).

0% subsidized, 100% cost recovery
25% subsidized, 75% cost recovery
50% subsidized, 50% cost recovery
75% subsidized, 25% cost recovery
100% subsidized, 0% cost recovery
Cost of parking enforcement
* required
Don't support at all
-
Might support
+
Really support
Support
* required
Not important
Somewhat important
Important
Very important
Not sure
More enforcement
Clear signage
Ease of payment for parking
Permits for property owners
Time limits
Cost recovery
Parking fees
Resident input
* required
Check out our guidelines for civility

Fields marked with * are required

Back to Intro