If not Arlington, Virginia, of what city/ state are you a resident?
No response.
Which of the following describes your personal experience and familiarity with Arlington County's DPR gymnastics and aquatics teams and classes? Please check all that apply.
I have at least one child who participates or has participated in the AAC, the Aerials, or the Tigers.
Do you support modifying the budgeting process so that gymnastics and aquatics team participation fees are based on the expected number of participants and direct costs with the goal of recovering no more than 100 percent of those costs?
Yes
Do you support DPR assessing a surcharge for non-residents who belong to Arlington County's aquatics and gymnastics teams?
Yes
If you answered yes to the previous question, what level of surcharge would you support?
5%
Would you support DPR setting an annual cap on the surcharge?
Yes
If you answered yes to the previous question, what annual cap level would you support?
$100
Would you support DPR reviewing and adjusting this cap as needed to correct for inflation and other economic factors every five years?
Yes
Is there anything else you'd like to say about the fees and surcharges associated with Arlington County's gymnastics and aquatics teams?
Please consider acceleratig the expansion of the gymnastics program at Barcroft into the second seldom-used gym at Barcroft. The County Board has already approved this expansion so there is no reason that this project should not be put out to bid ASAP. The cost of the expansion would be recouped by the County in less than one year of gymnastics classes, and Arlington residents wouldnât have go through the nightmare of trying to be on-line exactly at 7:30 am in the hope that they can register for these high demand classes as the County would be able to offer nearly twice as many classes.
Beginning in January, the work group will take stock of the operating model for these teams. Do you have any input you would like to provide on this topic at this time?
This survey fails to indicate that the same error that leads to overcharging for those who participate on the competitive gymnastics and swimming teams is also occurring in the regular swimming and gymnastic classes offered by DPR. Each 8-week swimming and gymnastic class is costing an additional +$50/child/session and this has been going on for at least three years. The overcharging for children who participate in swimming and gymnastics classes offered through DPRâ affects 12,000 kids! This has led to substantial profit for the county, which violates DPR's own rules of no more than 100% cost recovery.
Is there anything else you would like to add?
No response.
Survey Feedback:
How clear and understandable were the questions asked and options provided in this survey?
Moderately clear and understandable
Open Arlington is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open Arlington is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
Are you an Arlington County resident?
If not Arlington, Virginia, of what city/ state are you a resident?
No response.Which of the following describes your personal experience and familiarity with Arlington County's DPR gymnastics and aquatics teams and classes? Please check all that apply.
Do you support modifying the budgeting process so that gymnastics and aquatics team participation fees are based on the expected number of participants and direct costs with the goal of recovering no more than 100 percent of those costs?
Do you support DPR assessing a surcharge for non-residents who belong to Arlington County's aquatics and gymnastics teams?
If you answered yes to the previous question, what level of surcharge would you support?
Would you support DPR setting an annual cap on the surcharge?
If you answered yes to the previous question, what annual cap level would you support?
Would you support DPR reviewing and adjusting this cap as needed to correct for inflation and other economic factors every five years?
Is there anything else you'd like to say about the fees and surcharges associated with Arlington County's gymnastics and aquatics teams?
Please consider acceleratig the expansion of the gymnastics program at Barcroft into the second seldom-used gym at Barcroft. The County Board has already approved this expansion so there is no reason that this project should not be put out to bid ASAP. The cost of the expansion would be recouped by the County in less than one year of gymnastics classes, and Arlington residents wouldnât have go through the nightmare of trying to be on-line exactly at 7:30 am in the hope that they can register for these high demand classes as the County would be able to offer nearly twice as many classes.
Beginning in January, the work group will take stock of the operating model for these teams. Do you have any input you would like to provide on this topic at this time?
This survey fails to indicate that the same error that leads to overcharging for those who participate on the competitive gymnastics and swimming teams is also occurring in the regular swimming and gymnastic classes offered by DPR. Each 8-week swimming and gymnastic class is costing an additional +$50/child/session and this has been going on for at least three years. The overcharging for children who participate in swimming and gymnastics classes offered through DPRâ affects 12,000 kids! This has led to substantial profit for the county, which violates DPR's own rules of no more than 100% cost recovery.
Is there anything else you would like to add?
No response.Survey Feedback: How clear and understandable were the questions asked and options provided in this survey?