1st Draft - Supervisor District Boundaries, 3 options to review
59 registered responses
Open Humboldt is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open Humboldt is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
Your answers will NOT be saved
This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.
The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.
How well does the above draft map showing all proposed districts represent your community?
How well does “Draft Plan A, District A” represent your community?
What would you change about "Draft Plan A, District A"?
Willow Creek is an integral part of Northeast Humboldt. McKinleyville is not--it is much more closely allied with the population centers. If you need to balance population (a good idea) then please include less in the McK area and include Willow Creek to the Trinity County border in District E.
What would you keep about "Draft Plan A, District A"?
everything west of Lord Ellis pass.
How well does “Draft Plan A, District B” represent your community?
What would you change about "Draft Plan A, District B"?
No response.What would you keep about "Draft Plan A, District B"?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan A, District C” represent your community?
What would you change about "Draft Plan A, District C"?
No response.What would you keep about "Draft Plan A, District C"?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan A, District D” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan A, District D”?
Dividing Eureka needs more explanation as to why there and why this is a good idea.What would you keep about “Draft Plan A, District D”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan A, District E” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan A, District E”?
Willow Creek is an integral part of Northeast Humboldt. McKinleyville is not--it is much more closely allied with the population centers. If you need to balance population (a good idea) then please include less in the McK area and include Willow Creek to the Trinity County border in this district.
What would you keep about “Draft Plan A, District E”?
The rest of the map. This includes much of Karuk, Yurok, Hupa, and other tribal ancestral territories, including the Trinity and Klamath Rivers and the north coast of Humboldt County.
Any other thoughts on "Draft Plan A" you would like to share? Please specify if it is the full county or a specific district you are commenting on.
No response.How well does the above draft map showing all proposed districts represent your community?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan B, District A” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan B, District A”?
Willow Creek is an integral part of Northeast Humboldt. McKinleyville is not--it is much more closely allied with the population centers. If you need to balance population (a good idea) then please include less in the McK area and include Willow Creek to the Trinity County border in District E.
What would you keep about “Draft Plan B, District A”?
Everything west of Lord Ellis.
How well does “Draft Plan B, District B” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan B, District B”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan B, District B”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan B, District C” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan B, District C”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan B, District C”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan B, District D” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan B, District D”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan B, District D”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan B, District E” represent your community?
No response.What would you change about “Draft Plan B, District E”?
Willow Creek is an integral part of Northeast Humboldt. McKinleyville is not--it is much more closely allied with the population centers. If you need to balance population (a good idea) then please include less in the McK area and include Willow Creek to the Trinity County border in District E.
What would you keep about “Draft Plan B, District E”?
No response.Any other thoughts on "Draft Plan B" you would like to share? Please specify if it is the full county or a specific district you are commenting on.
No response.How well does the above draft map showing all proposed districts represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan C, District A”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan C, District A”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan C, District B” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan C, District B”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan C, District B”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan C, District C” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan C, District C”?
No response.What would you keep about “Draft Plan C, District C”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan C, District D” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan C, District D”?
not clear why District D would have so much of the coast north of its population.
What would you keep about “Draft Plan C, District D”?
No response.How well does “Draft Plan C, District E” represent your community?
What would you change about “Draft Plan C, District E”?
Please report Native populations in your census reporting for all plans. Other designations are important but Natives are an important component of Humboldt County.
What would you keep about “Draft Plan C, District E”?
Better than draft plans A and B, thoroughly includes the Native communities within Humboldt County.
Any other thoughts on “Draft Plan C” you would like to share? Please specify if it is the full county or a specific district you are commenting on.
No response.Any other comments you would like to share with the Redistricting Advisory Commission?
No response.