Participation Guidelines
The City of Flagstaff (the “City”) has partnered with OpenGov, a third-party online forum provider, to create a civic engagement platform that will allow the citizens of Flagstaff get more involved in City government. Flagstaff Community Forum is a forum for the discussion of proposed City projects and upcoming policy topics related to local government in the City and its partner agencies. The topics are generated by City staff, commissions, and Council for the purpose of public participation in current government decision making.
To ensure that all voices are heard and that forum participants are able to speak freely about the posted topics, participants who register to use the forum must agree to not post disruptive statements. Disruptive statements include the following:
- Statements that do not relate to the posted topic;
- Personal attacks and statements that threaten or abuse other forum participants, members of the public, City staff or City officials;
- Statements that discriminate on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc.
- Hate speech of any kind;
- Statements containing any sort of commercial advertising or soliciting funds, goods, or services;
- Repetitive or meaningless messages (“spam”);
- A statement from a user who has falsified their registration information with the intent to post multiple statements in one topic or to misrepresent their city of residence; and
- Statements that include obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.
OpenGov, acting as the forum monitor, will remove any disruptive statements that are posted on the forum. Forum participants who post disruptive statements may lose their posting privileges.
Frequently asked questions about the participation guidelines
Why does Open Town Hall monitor for disruptive statements?
OpenGov is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate, if the forum has disruptive statements.
Does Open Town Hall find many disruptive statements?
No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements on OpenGov moderated topics nationwide are disruptive.
What does Open Town Hall do if they find a disruptive statement?
OpenGov
- moves the statement to a different web page,
- describes the problem in an email to the author, and
- invites the author to change the statement.
Does Open Town Hall ever edit or delete statements?
Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement. If a statement is removed from the public website, it will still be seen by the City of Flagstaff and be part of the public record.
If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?
Yes. Open Town Hall encourages open dialog and debate which, by necessity, includes disagreements.
How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?
Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.
Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.
Personal Attack v. Not A Personal Attack
He is a liar. V. He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.
She misrepresented the truth. V. I don't believe what she said.
He is greedy. V. He is making money from this project.
It is merely a power play on her part. V. She will announce her candidacy soon.
Translate
Do you support widening the right of way on Milton Road for the purpose of:
Do you have any additional comments about widening Milton Road or not?
Milton Road needs to be like the arterials in Phoenix: six lanes, limited access, with turn lanes in addition to six lanes, with a median, with landscaping between the traffic and the sidewalk.
I am "unsure" about bike lanes. There should ABSOLUTELY NOT be bike lanes in the flow of traffic; those are death traps and will almost never be used by cyclists. If there are bike lanes separated from auto traffic by a median and landscaping, that would be nice.
We need sidewalks... but not wider sidewalks. Unless cyclists are meant to share the sidewalks, then they need to be wider.
Milton is the main marketing corridor for the City of Flagstaff. it desperately needs to be made more friendly and streamlined for driving, less annoying for driving, and more beautiful. How about some native landscaping and pine trees to dress up the corridor? Right now everyone's first experience with flagstaff (and NAU) is a really irritating, inconvenient, and ugly strip mall. Let's fix that.
I imagine a dedicated bus lane all the way from south milton through east 66 and up 180 would be great for express busses. Express busses are highly successful in my experience, much more so than orbiters. That would let people all over town access the shopping on Milton. But if you can't put it through 180 and 66, what's the point of doing it on Milton? I'd skip it.
This is primarily an automotive access corridor and always will be. Let's not make the perfect (bike, walk, bus) the enemy of the good (fixing the auto problem and ugliness). Biking and walking are
How many buildings would you be willing to remove in order to add the following features?
Do you have any other comments about potential impacts to buildings on Milton Road?
A lot of the buildings are ugly and outdated. Tear them down and replace with master planned and architecturally standard limited access development that works with the new traffic flow.How many parking lots would you be willing to remove in order to add the following features?
Do you have any other comments about potential impacts to parking lots on Milton Road?
Parking lots are ugly, and we have way more than we need- except in a couple of strip malls.What types of enhancements are needed on Milton Road? Please rate each improvement.
Do you think there are other enhancements that are needed on Milton Road?
No response.A raised median on Milton Road could improve safety but would limit access and left turning movements to and from individual business driveways. Would you support the construction of a raised median on Milton Road?
In 2040, if nothing is done, it is estimated to take 7 mins to drive from Forest Meadows St to Humphreys St on Milton Rd. How much of an increase in vehicle travel time would you be willing to accept in order to bring improvements for bus users, cyclists and pedestrians to an acceptable level?
Do you have any other comments about Milton Road enhancements that you would like to share?
Focus on the aesthetics and the automotive improvements, don't compromise those for bus, bike, walking.Please rate how much you support each of the below Milton Road alternatives. [1 = Strongly Oppose, 3 = Oppose, 5 = Neutral, 7 = Support, 9 = Strongly Support]
Why do you support your preferred alternative? Why do you not support others?
6a is the best. Run busses in right lanes. Maximize total traffic lanes (six) and width including generous landscaping. Don't imagine that cyclists will use that bike lane, it's a death trap, they will use the sidewalk. A bike lane on the sidewalk is a better idea. Limit access to a minimum; only major side streets should have access to Milton, not any driveways. The wider the right of way the better; it will more more traffic and remove more of the poorly planned buildings and parking lots. Don't make people wait for the bus in the middle of the street, that sounds horrible.Which enhancements do you feel are needed to make Milton Road a “Great Street”? (select as many as you want)
Please rate how well each alternative would make Milton Road a “Great Street”? (1 = Very Poorly, 3 = Poorly, 5 = Fairly Well, 7 = Well, 9 = Very Well)
Please provide any additional comments about Milton Road as a “Great Street” here:
A consistent plan for Milton, 180, and 66, please... Consider an architectural theme like a "route 66" theme and/or a mountain modern theme.