Participation Guidelines
The City of Flagstaff (the “City”) has partnered with OpenGov, a third-party online forum provider, to create a civic engagement platform that will allow the citizens of Flagstaff get more involved in City government. Flagstaff Community Forum is a forum for the discussion of proposed City projects and upcoming policy topics related to local government in the City and its partner agencies. The topics are generated by City staff, commissions, and Council for the purpose of public participation in current government decision making.
To ensure that all voices are heard and that forum participants are able to speak freely about the posted topics, participants who register to use the forum must agree to not post disruptive statements. Disruptive statements include the following:
- Statements that do not relate to the posted topic;
- Personal attacks and statements that threaten or abuse other forum participants, members of the public, City staff or City officials;
- Statements that discriminate on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc.
- Hate speech of any kind;
- Statements containing any sort of commercial advertising or soliciting funds, goods, or services;
- Repetitive or meaningless messages (“spam”);
- A statement from a user who has falsified their registration information with the intent to post multiple statements in one topic or to misrepresent their city of residence; and
- Statements that include obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.
OpenGov, acting as the forum monitor, will remove any disruptive statements that are posted on the forum. Forum participants who post disruptive statements may lose their posting privileges.
Frequently asked questions about the participation guidelines
Why does Open Town Hall monitor for disruptive statements?
OpenGov is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate, if the forum has disruptive statements.
Does Open Town Hall find many disruptive statements?
No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements on OpenGov moderated topics nationwide are disruptive.
What does Open Town Hall do if they find a disruptive statement?
OpenGov
- moves the statement to a different web page,
- describes the problem in an email to the author, and
- invites the author to change the statement.
Does Open Town Hall ever edit or delete statements?
Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement. If a statement is removed from the public website, it will still be seen by the City of Flagstaff and be part of the public record.
If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?
Yes. Open Town Hall encourages open dialog and debate which, by necessity, includes disagreements.
How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?
Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.
Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.
Personal Attack v. Not A Personal Attack
He is a liar. V. He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.
She misrepresented the truth. V. I don't believe what she said.
He is greedy. V. He is making money from this project.
It is merely a power play on her part. V. She will announce her candidacy soon.
Translate
Do you think these amenities are important for HOH development to include for their residents? (1=not important, 5=very important)?
If you lived in HOH, which of the following amenities would you take advantage of?
What other amenities would be useful for HOH developments to provide that would increase walking, biking, and transit use?
Thoughtful traffic planning. Restriction or prohibition of HOH near current areas of traffic congestion.
Should strategies that reduce personal vehicle use be accompanied by a reduction of parking on-site? Note that there is always a direct and opportunity cost to provide parking that makes each unit more expensive.
Why should or why shouldn't on-site parking be variable depending on a site's transportation options?
Requiring a developer to provide a parking space per bed would avoid the insane over populated developments in areas where mobility is already a mess. Pushing the HOH developments to less dense areas (at least until the traffic engineers can get a handle on the current congestion issues), would lessen the negative impact on an already painful traffic situation. The idea of worrying about the cost of each unit is just a red-herring as the cost is based on what the market will support, developers aren't looking to provide the most affordable housing, they are looking to make the largest possible profit. We should be catering to businesses that would actually provide a meaningful impact on good paying, sustainable and long term jobs and not catering to the HOH developers.
How important is it that the City has the ability and funding to enforce a development's promised TDM strategies? (For example: making sure the development continues to provide bus passes to residents even after a management change)