Click this link to optimize Flagstaff Community Forum for screen readers Skip to Content
Flagstaff Community Forum
Opengov

How can Flagstaff better manage transportation demand associated with High Occupancy Housing?

27 Registered Responses

0
<20

0

0 responses
<20
3
20-29

3

3 responses
Tap to select
20-29
3
30-39

3

3 responses
Tap to select
30-39
6
40-49

6

6 responses
Tap to select
40-49
2
50-59

2

2 responses
Tap to select
50-59
4
60-69

4

4 responses
Tap to select
60-69
1
70-79

1

1 response
Tap to select
70-79
0
>79

0

0 responses
>79
8
Age not shared

8

8 responses
Tap to select
Age not shared
Click bars to select responses

27 registered responses


Do you think these amenities are important for HOH development to include for their residents? (1=not important, 5=very important)?

More short-term bike parking
Response Percent Response Count
1 3.8% 1
2 11.5% 3
3 7.7% 2
4 34.6% 9
5 38.5% 10
Covered and secure long-term bike parking
Response Percent Response Count
1 3.8% 1
2 3.8% 1
3 3.8% 1
4 26.9% 7
5 61.5% 16
Car share services
Response Percent Response Count
1 3.8% 1
2 15.4% 4
3 19.2% 5
4 26.9% 7
5 34.6% 9
Bus passes
Response Percent Response Count
1 3.8% 1
2 7.7% 2
3 7.7% 2
4 23.1% 6
5 57.7% 15

If you lived in HOH, which of the following amenities would you take advantage of?

Short term bike parking
Response Percent Response Count
All the time 60.0% 15
Sometimes 28.0% 7
Rarely 8.0% 2
Long term and secure bike parking
Response Percent Response Count
All the time 72.0% 18
Sometimes 20.0% 5
Never 4.0% 1
Car share
Response Percent Response Count
All the time 12.0% 3
Sometimes 44.0% 11
Rarely 24.0% 6
Never 16.0% 4
Bus passes
Response Percent Response Count
All the time 36.0% 9
Sometimes 52.0% 13
Rarely 8.0% 2
Never 4.0% 1

What other amenities would be useful for HOH developments to provide that would increase walking, biking, and transit use?

Answered
15
Skipped
12

Should strategies that reduce personal vehicle use be accompanied by a reduction of parking on-site? Note that there is always a direct and opportunity cost to provide parking that makes each unit more expensive.

Response Percent Response Count
Yes - Always 26.9% 7
Yes - Sometimes 38.5% 10
I would need more information 15.4% 4
No 19.2% 5

Why should or why shouldn't on-site parking be variable depending on a site's transportation options?

Answered
21
Skipped
6

How important is it that the City has the ability and funding to enforce a development's promised TDM strategies? (For example: making sure the development continues to provide bus passes to residents even after a management change)

Response Percent Response Count
Important - The City should find new funds to enforce this 46.2% 12
Important - But the City should not spend any additional money 30.8% 8
Not Important - Because the City should not spend resources on this 3.8% 1
Other 19.2% 5
Name not shown inside City Limits
October 9, 2017, 12:30 AM
  • Do you think these amenities are important for HOH development to include for their residents? (1=not important, 5=very important)?
    • More short-term bike parking - 5
    • Covered and secure long-term bike parking - 5
    • Car share services - 5
    • Bus passes - 5
  • If you lived in HOH, which of the following amenities would you take advantage of?
    • Short term bike parking - All the time
    • Long term and secure bike parking - All the time
    • Car share - All the time
    • Bus passes - All the time
  • What other amenities would be useful for HOH developments to provide that would increase walking, biking, and transit use?

    Have fewer residents in the development. I.e., avoid HOH developments altogether. That is what I would consider an 'amenity' for all of us.

  • Should strategies that reduce personal vehicle use be accompanied by a reduction of parking on-site? Note that there is always a direct and opportunity cost to provide parking that makes each unit more expensive.
    • No
  • Why should or why shouldn't on-site parking be variable depending on a site's transportation options?

    Witness the recent "road rage" incident in the Railroad Springs neighborhood, where a man shot another driver in the face because he was fed up with the ridiculous parking situation that the townhouse development has imposed on the surrounding neighborhoods (see Daily Sun article from 10/7/17). COF should not let developers get away with not providing enough parking. That essentially shifts their parking shortages onto the rest of the community and we have to pay for it.

  • How important is it that the City has the ability and funding to enforce a development's promised TDM strategies? (For example: making sure the development continues to provide bus passes to residents even after a management change)
    • Other - What is 'TDM'? That is not defined anywhere on this page. Of course it is important that COF enforces developers promises. Make the developer pay for that enforcement up front. I don't want to pay for it.
Flagstaff Community Forum is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Flagstaff Community Forum is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

One of the best ways to get fewer vehicles on the road is to create other transportation options that are as appealing as driving. High Occupancy Housing (HOH) developments can be designed in a way that promotes these other options.


1
2
3
4
5
More short-term bike parking
Covered and secure long-term bike parking
Car share services
Bus passes
All the time
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Short term bike parking
Long term and secure bike parking
Car share
Bus passes
Check out our guidelines for civility
Back to Intro