Participation Guidelines
The City of Flagstaff (the “City”) has partnered with OpenGov, a third-party online forum provider, to create a civic engagement platform that will allow the citizens of Flagstaff get more involved in City government. Flagstaff Community Forum is a forum for the discussion of proposed City projects and upcoming policy topics related to local government in the City and its partner agencies. The topics are generated by City staff, commissions, and Council for the purpose of public participation in current government decision making.
To ensure that all voices are heard and that forum participants are able to speak freely about the posted topics, participants who register to use the forum must agree to not post disruptive statements. Disruptive statements include the following:
- Statements that do not relate to the posted topic;
- Personal attacks and statements that threaten or abuse other forum participants, members of the public, City staff or City officials;
- Statements that discriminate on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc.
- Hate speech of any kind;
- Statements containing any sort of commercial advertising or soliciting funds, goods, or services;
- Repetitive or meaningless messages (“spam”);
- A statement from a user who has falsified their registration information with the intent to post multiple statements in one topic or to misrepresent their city of residence; and
- Statements that include obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.
OpenGov, acting as the forum monitor, will remove any disruptive statements that are posted on the forum. Forum participants who post disruptive statements may lose their posting privileges.
Frequently asked questions about the participation guidelines
Why does Open Town Hall monitor for disruptive statements?
OpenGov is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate, if the forum has disruptive statements.
Does Open Town Hall find many disruptive statements?
No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements on OpenGov moderated topics nationwide are disruptive.
What does Open Town Hall do if they find a disruptive statement?
OpenGov
- moves the statement to a different web page,
- describes the problem in an email to the author, and
- invites the author to change the statement.
Does Open Town Hall ever edit or delete statements?
Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement. If a statement is removed from the public website, it will still be seen by the City of Flagstaff and be part of the public record.
If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?
Yes. Open Town Hall encourages open dialog and debate which, by necessity, includes disagreements.
How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?
Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.
Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.
Personal Attack v. Not A Personal Attack
He is a liar. V. He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.
She misrepresented the truth. V. I don't believe what she said.
He is greedy. V. He is making money from this project.
It is merely a power play on her part. V. She will announce her candidacy soon.
Translate
Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply):
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character?
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach?
I support the organic development of neighborhood character by the neighborhood. I question the imposition of "neighborhood character" by the City of Flagstaff.Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards?
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea?
Affordability and freedom of expression would be a justification for the exemption.Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards?
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included?
Prohibiting large box like structures will improve the neighborhood. I oppose dictating color or materials that are temporary and can be changed at will.Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards?
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included?
unwarrented expense.Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)?
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included?
Not on single family home.Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay?
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated?
City staff should not be dictating anything that can easily be changed without a permit as it is a useless effort and waste of city staff resources.Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay?
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included?
No response.Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement?
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included?
No response.Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes?
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included?
Until the City addresses parking in non parking spaces throughout the city this should not be a requirement.Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay?
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included?
Consistency is normally a matter of economics and does not need regulatory requirements.Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages.
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures?
If it meets building code requirements, then it is fine. No further regulation is needed.Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home?
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes?
Building code is adequate regulatory control.Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes?
Why do you think any shed roof standards should or should include a requirement for contrasting roof planes?
Building code is adequate regulatory control.Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation?
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included?
An inappropriate regulatory expense for a small, constrained parcel.What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja?
No response.In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element)
No response.Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association?
Carefully consider how much the city government should interfere with the lives of those living in the neighborhood.