Participation Guidelines
The City of Flagstaff (the “City”) has partnered with OpenGov, a third-party online forum provider, to create a civic engagement platform that will allow the citizens of Flagstaff get more involved in City government. Flagstaff Community Forum is a forum for the discussion of proposed City projects and upcoming policy topics related to local government in the City and its partner agencies. The topics are generated by City staff, commissions, and Council for the purpose of public participation in current government decision making.
To ensure that all voices are heard and that forum participants are able to speak freely about the posted topics, participants who register to use the forum must agree to not post disruptive statements. Disruptive statements include the following:
- Statements that do not relate to the posted topic;
- Personal attacks and statements that threaten or abuse other forum participants, members of the public, City staff or City officials;
- Statements that discriminate on the basis of race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual preference, age, region, disability, etc.
- Hate speech of any kind;
- Statements containing any sort of commercial advertising or soliciting funds, goods, or services;
- Repetitive or meaningless messages (“spam”);
- A statement from a user who has falsified their registration information with the intent to post multiple statements in one topic or to misrepresent their city of residence; and
- Statements that include obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise illegal material.
OpenGov, acting as the forum monitor, will remove any disruptive statements that are posted on the forum. Forum participants who post disruptive statements may lose their posting privileges.
Frequently asked questions about the participation guidelines
Why does Open Town Hall monitor for disruptive statements?
OpenGov is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate, if the forum has disruptive statements.
Does Open Town Hall find many disruptive statements?
No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements on OpenGov moderated topics nationwide are disruptive.
What does Open Town Hall do if they find a disruptive statement?
OpenGov
- moves the statement to a different web page,
- describes the problem in an email to the author, and
- invites the author to change the statement.
Does Open Town Hall ever edit or delete statements?
Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement. If a statement is removed from the public website, it will still be seen by the City of Flagstaff and be part of the public record.
If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?
Yes. Open Town Hall encourages open dialog and debate which, by necessity, includes disagreements.
How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?
Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.
Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.
Personal Attack v. Not A Personal Attack
He is a liar. V. He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.
She misrepresented the truth. V. I don't believe what she said.
He is greedy. V. He is making money from this project.
It is merely a power play on her part. V. She will announce her candidacy soon.
Translate
Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply):
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character?
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach?
I would say it depends on what the folks who live there think. If a majority want it then yes I would agree.Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards?
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea?
A good idea if the people living there wish to preserve the character of the neighborhood. If the people want it then we should too.Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards?
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included?
As long as the buildings are not of a commercial nature or commercial use, then yes it's a good idea.Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards?
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included?
If done as in the illustration, then it's just a bogus adjustment with no real substance. If done with more emphasis then it might work.Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)?
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included?
It's much better than no roof modulation.Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay?
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated?
I actually think that because building materials are scarce, other materials could also be used BUT only with the proviso that they "appear" to look like the more conventional materials.Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay?
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included?
Windows with more trim and recess look much better than w/o them.Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement?
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included?
Helps to shield entrance from rain or snow when entering or exitingDo you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes?
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included?
I think this idea is bogus. One can always easily discern which is the front of a residence.Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay?
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included?
It would definitely appear to me that this restricts the INTERIOR layout of the building too much so should not be done.Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages.
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures?
I do not know of any reason not to allow them.Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home?
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes?
Depends on others factors whether this should be ok on homes or not.Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes?
Why do you think any shed roof standards should or should include a requirement for contrasting roof planes?
I think it depends on which way they are sloping. Should not be into each other but away from each otherDo you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation?
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included?
I think either way is ok. Should not be a requirement.What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja?
Varying the face plane of a new building (facade articulation) is one of several ways to break up the massive appearance and larger scale of a building. Facade articulation refers to the surfaces of the building, whether they are flat, pushed up to the street, or pushed back. Some examples include:
The change in a roof’s visual profile (roof modulation standards) could apply to buildings longer than 30 feet with the goal of creating visual interest by not having excessively long and continuous roof lines. A variation in roof forms can add visual interest to a building by breaking up the building’s appearance against the skyline.
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element)
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association?
It's THEIR neighborhood and the city should respect what they say they want or do not want.