Click this link to optimize Open City Hall for screen readers Skip to Content
Open City Hall
Opengov

Carmen Road Bridge Survey

100 registered responses


1. Do you currently have the need to cross Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 62.2% 61
No 37.8% 37

2. If yes, what is your typical primary mode for crossing Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive? Choose one.

Response Percent Response Count
Drive 28.8% 21
Bike/Walk from Foothill Boulevard 17.8% 13
Bike/Walk from Phar Lap Drive 20.5% 15
Jaywalk across Stevens Creek Boulevard 32.9% 24

3. Do you feel the need for an additional pedestrian/bicycle crossing of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 71.0% 71
No 24.0% 24
No Opinion 5.0% 5

4. If you could design your ideal alternative to cross Stevens Creek Boulevard, what would it look like and what would it feature? Enter your answer in the text box below. Feel free to include examples of similar infrastructure you have seen or heard of.

Answered
62
Skipped
38

5. Would you support a pedestrian/bicycle bridge connecting Carmen Road across Stevens Creek Boulevard?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 76.0% 76
No 21.0% 21
No Opinion 3.0% 3

6. If yes, how often would you use it?

Response Percent Response Count
Several times a week. I would bike/walk to and from schools, parks, rec centers, and more. 41.9% 36
Occasionally, if I have time to bike/walk nearby. 29.1% 25
Rarely. For the most part, I would continue to bike/walk my current path. 11.6% 10
Rarely. For the most part, I would continue to drive. 17.4% 15

7. How far do you live from Carmen Road at Stevens Creek Boulevard?

Response Percent Response Count
I live on Carmen Road 12.0% 12
I live within a ¼ mile radius from Carmen Road 24.0% 24
I live within a ½ mile radius from Carmen Road 22.0% 22
I live more than a ½ mile radius from Carmen Road 42.0% 42

8. If the feasibility study concluded that a pedestrian/bicycle bridge connecting Carmen Road is possible to implement, how would that impact you? We welcome your comments. If you have questions or comments about the Carmen Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Feasibility Study, please enter them below.

Answered
71
Skipped
29
January 30, 2019, 1:17 PM
  • 1. Do you currently have the need to cross Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive?
    • No
  • 2. If yes, what is your typical primary mode for crossing Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive? Choose one.
    No response.
  • 3. Do you feel the need for an additional pedestrian/bicycle crossing of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Phar Lap Drive?
    • No
  • 4. If you could design your ideal alternative to cross Stevens Creek Boulevard, what would it look like and what would it feature? Enter your answer in the text box below. Feel free to include examples of similar infrastructure you have seen or heard of.

    Update the existing crossing at Phar Lap to assist pedestrians and cyclists. Add a beacon crossing so drivers are more aware of activity in the crosswalk. (Similar to what is on Fremont Ave at Fremont High School)
    A bridge in this location is a total waste of City money. The notion that it supports the route to school is laughable. Definitely wouldn't shorten the distance to MV High School.

  • 5. Would you support a pedestrian/bicycle bridge connecting Carmen Road across Stevens Creek Boulevard?
    • No
  • 6. If yes, how often would you use it?
    No response.
  • 7. How far do you live from Carmen Road at Stevens Creek Boulevard?
    • I live more than a ½ mile radius from Carmen Road
  • 8. If the feasibility study concluded that a pedestrian/bicycle bridge connecting Carmen Road is possible to implement, how would that impact you? We welcome your comments. If you have questions or comments about the Carmen Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Feasibility Study, please enter them below.

    Well, well, well, another initiative to serve the bike coalition! Are you kidding me? Make the current crossings safer for users and quit initiating projects that frivolously spends the City money. This bridge would surely cost $ thousands of dollars to construct and is not for the better good of the City.
    Parents that currently drive their children to school will continue to do so. This bridge will not remedy getting cars off the road to use an out of the way bridge. Abort the idea!

Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Open City Hall has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Community Feedback will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Community Feedback will just share your response with Cupertino staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Open City Hall). Registration is free.

The City of Cupertino has contracted with Community Feedback to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the City of Cupertino restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Community Feedback enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Community Feedback uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the City of Cupertino guidelines for civility, Community Feedback uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Community Feedback will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the City of Cupertino to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Open City Hall, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Community Feedback is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Community Feedback is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The City of Cupertino offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The City of Cupertino has contracted with OpenGov to administer Open City Hall.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Please select the "Next >" button below to submit your response.


THANK YOU

THANK YOU very much for taking the time to fill out this survey.

The project team will use the survey results to shape the next stages of developing the Carmen Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Feasibility Study.
 

Check out our guidelines for civility
Back to Intro