1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
I regularly drive on streets where traffic calming devices are installed
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
Increased safety
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
Other - Confusing and expensve mixture of solutions
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
Undecided
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
Undecided
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
50% approval prior to meeting, walking, investigating may be too high a threshold
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
No
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
Safety& Resident engagement co-equal. Residents know their area much better than any engineering study could ever capture.
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
Yes. Insufficient weighting of resident concerns and observations. It only takes one unpredicted speed demon to kill a child.
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.
11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
Traffc circles—people don’t use them correctly. Crosswalks—way too many types. Completely confuses out of town drivers. We need actual pedestrian activated crossing lights. Everyone knows what a ref light means. Too many changes of speed limit (e.g. Washtenaw) or time of day (Huron Parkway near HHS)
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
Traffic lights for pedestrians. Period.
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
No response.
A2 Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in A2 Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
50% approval prior to meeting, walking, investigating may be too high a threshold
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
Safety& Resident engagement co-equal. Residents know their area much better than any engineering study could ever capture.
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
Yes. Insufficient weighting of resident concerns and observations. It only takes one unpredicted speed demon to kill a child.
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
Traffc circles—people don’t use them correctly. Crosswalks—way too many types. Completely confuses out of town drivers. We need actual pedestrian activated crossing lights. Everyone knows what a ref light means. Too many changes of speed limit (e.g. Washtenaw) or time of day (Huron Parkway near HHS)
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
Traffic lights for pedestrians. Period.
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
No response.