1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
I live in a neighborhood that previously went through the Traffic Calming Program
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
Increased safety
Less cut-through traffic
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
Solutions driven by community preference rather than data or engineering expertise
Traffic diverted to neighboring streets
Slowed emergency response
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
No
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
Undecided
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
I like the current threshold of greater than 50%. Problem on my street was created when intervention occurred on a nearby street.
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
Undecided
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
No response.
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
Raise the requirement to 15 points to proceed.
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.
11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
No
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
No
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
I envision every residential street in Ann Arbor with speed bumps and other devices making even harder to move around the city. The ripple effect of traffic calming on one street causing traffic to diver to another residential street because the main feeder road (Packard) is narrowed and the wait time at Packard and Stadium signal is too long. This would appear to be the downside of the traffic calming.
A2 Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in A2 Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
Translate
1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
I like the current threshold of greater than 50%. Problem on my street was created when intervention occurred on a nearby street.
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
No response.9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
Raise the requirement to 15 points to proceed.
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
No
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
No
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
I envision every residential street in Ann Arbor with speed bumps and other devices making even harder to move around the city. The ripple effect of traffic calming on one street causing traffic to diver to another residential street because the main feeder road (Packard) is narrowed and the wait time at Packard and Stadium signal is too long. This would appear to be the downside of the traffic calming.