1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
I regularly drive on streets where traffic calming devices are installed
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
Increased safety
Support for different modes of transportation (vehicles, bikes, pedestrians and transit)
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
Solutions driven by data and engineering expertise rather than community preference
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
Undecided
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
Undecided
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
I feel as though getting 50% to participate may be near impossible due to citizens being "busy" or unaware until too late.
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
Yes
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
No response.
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
No response.
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.
11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
Making a choke point, where the street becomes narrow, may force cyclists and cars too close together.
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
Probably out of the question, railroad style arms that block traffic for pedestrians!
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
No response.
A2 Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in A2 Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
I feel as though getting 50% to participate may be near impossible due to citizens being "busy" or unaware until too late.
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
No response.9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
No response.10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No response.11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
Making a choke point, where the street becomes narrow, may force cyclists and cars too close together.
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
Probably out of the question, railroad style arms that block traffic for pedestrians!
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
No response.