1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
I do not have past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program but I am interested in learning more
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
Reduced speed
Increased safety
Less cut-through traffic
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
Traffic diverted to neighboring streets
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
Yes
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
Yes
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
No response.
7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
Yes
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
How can pedestrians be alerted to electric :blue_car:s turning in their direction
when a person on foot can not hear (and be aware of) the rumble of a high-powered internal combustion
engine? :neutral_face::open_mouth:
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
:eyes:s good to me— I hope it works!
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No
11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
No
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
No
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
Looks good on paper (iPad screen) — I hope, after they have been implemented, they will work in my 48104 neighborhood.
A2 Open City Hall is not a certified voting system or ballot box. As with any public comment process, participation in A2 Open City Hall is voluntary. The responses in this record are not necessarily representative of the whole population, nor do they reflect the opinions of any government agency or elected officials.
1. What is your past involvement with the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
2. Which of the following do you view as benefits of the Traffic Calming Program? (check all that apply)
3. Please check any concerns that you have about the Traffic Calming Program
4. Do the proposed thresholds for community participation and support seem reasonable?
5. Does the community engagement format and strategy seem effective?
6. Do you have additional comments or questions related to the proposed engagement process?
No response.7. Do the proposed program objectives capture what you think is important?
8. Have we missed anything in the proposed objectives that you think should be added?
How can pedestrians be alerted to electric :blue_car:s turning in their direction
when a person on foot can not hear (and be aware of) the rumble of a high-powered internal combustion
engine? :neutral_face::open_mouth:
9. Do you have concerns about any of the proposed qualification criteria?
:eyes:s good to me— I hope it works!
10. Have we missed any other factors that should be included in determining eligibility for the Traffic Calming Program?
No
11. Do you have concerns about anything included in the proposed toolbox of devices?
No
12. Have we missed any devices that should be added to the toolbox for traffic calming on local streets?
No
13. What questions or concerns do you have about how the Traffic Calming Program will function?
Looks good on paper (iPad screen) — I hope, after they have been implemented, they will work in my 48104 neighborhood.